A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving possible neighbours above the construction of a wall in a coastal site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has attracted nationwide interest following an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family dwelling at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of organizing breaches, environmental concerns, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Times posting about René Collier and also the Irish Moments posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design operates at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, seek out to create their family members dwelling. The situation is now emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, exactly where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of founded residents. Based on the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting created by their prospective neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under organizing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their organizing permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries of their web site, resulting in an encroachment over a Exclusive Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, therefore areas are subject matter to demanding controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. In their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have Long lasting ecological penalties, specially in the delicate coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach in their arranging permission, and say the wall, that is partly built, is in the correct posture. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their watch, an allegation which has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal organizing disputes, wherever views of the sea are each very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has given that turn out to be emblematic on the depth on the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they had been meant to Collect Visible evidence of the wall’s posture relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Adult men entered the water through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm h2o to photograph the website became Among the most putting descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of actions ended up cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into a region influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up protected intimately with the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to comprehend the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard even more submissions on whether or not interim orders must be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential moment during the authorized timeline.
In the core from the dispute is usually a disagreement in excess of boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as manufactured, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his assessment of planning files, maps, and disorders attached towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is determined by problem for environmental safety and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public watch, insisting in its place that it's about making certain that progress at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few merely trying to develop a family members dwelling in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Specific Area of Conservation and say that each one functions have been carried out according to professional information and authorised plans. Their lawyers have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as moving into the sea for the duration of a storm, do not alter the underlying information.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how preparing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around development of wall at coastal site is becoming a shorthand description for your problem that lots of observers see as progressively popular. As sea ranges rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation between non-public land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Instances write-up about Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely René Collier pointed out the businessman had Formerly been associated with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental difficulties, though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly different Experienced backgrounds can find on their own aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, are getting to be synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of waistline-large water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting both of those the Bodily truth of your coastline along with the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal strategy.
Given that the High Court proceedings keep on, the result stays unsure. The courtroom should identify whether the wall as designed complies with arranging permission and irrespective of whether any encroachment into a Special Spot of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and preparing problems. Yet the human element remains central: neighbours who should Dwell along with each other lengthy following the authorized charges have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of design operates at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, however the implications of the case extend beyond that handle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the significance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. In addition it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental problems such as environmental defense and assets rights are perceived to be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal questions. Whether it will eventually finally be altered, taken out, or done as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s findings. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will likely keep on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more intently watched scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.